It is becoming more common these days to define a tax exemption, subsidy, loophole or exclusion as a tax expenditure. That can seem a little confusing until you understand what is happening. Catherine Rampell in an article entitled Tax Breaks: A Primer explains it pretty well.
… “loopholes and subsidies” are formally called tax expenditures. The name comes from the fact that they are arithmetically equivalent to spending government money.
Here’s how: Charging a company one dollar less in taxes is effectively the same as giving a company one dollar; both leave the government with one dollar less, and the company with one dollar more. But politically, calling the subsidy a “tax break” sounds a lot better than calling it a “spending” gift.
The significance of this dollar wise this is best illustrated in budget terms here in Washington State by the following taken from the State’s 2012 Tax Exemption Study. Specific exemptions for B&O taxes for the 2011 -2013 biennium totaled some $20 billion while the actual revenue collected from these taxes equaled almost the same at $21 billion. Just getting rid of a few of these exemptions could easily bridge the approximately $1.3 billion shortfall now projected for our state the next two years. Continue reading
The following letter was sent today to Washington State Attorney General Bob Ferguson:
Dear Attorney General Ferguson:
I am wondering what the procedure is to have the RCW’s changed when the Washington State Supreme Court renders a decision declaring a law or part of a law unconstitutional. The Court has ruled that an initiative filed must conform to the current version of a law or it is not valid. Continue reading
The Washington State Supreme Court ruled on February 28, 2013 that Tim Eyman’s Initiative 1053 was unconstitutional. The ruling is a huge win for Washington State taxpayers because it throws out the supermajority vote requirement to close any tax loophole that Eyman had put in the initiative. Tax exemptions are hard enough to close as it is without giving a minority of legislators the ability to trump a decision by a majority of legislators.
Voters last year passed Initiative 1185 which was pretty much a clone of I-1053. Because Initiative 1276 – the Txpayers Fiscal Reform Act we filed was based on current law at the time, we put in provisions repealing parts of I-1185 dealing with the supermajority votes. The RCW or Revised Code of Washington will now reflect the decision of the Washington State Supreme Court and we will be refiling our initiative deleting the parts relating to I-1053 and I-1185 that were ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. This should make the initiative much easier to get support for because it narrows the scope of the initiative by not having to deal with the subject of supermajority votes.
The decision of the Washington State Supreme Court was the opinion they wrote in League of Education Voters vs the State of Washington. You can read by clicking on the link.
Not funny how the Republicans refuse to close corporate tax loopholes. Tax loopholes that don’t provide a benefit to taxpayers and working families, but which only add to the corporate profit sheet, are corporate welfare. As Sanders notes, corporate profit is at an all time high, while corporate taxes are near a record low.
Corporations and the wealthy need to pay their fair share to keep the American economy going by helping to insure that Federal dollars are used to create jobs and provide basic human services, not further pad the pocketbooks of wealthy individuals and corporations. Congress needs to close tax loopholes as part of any plan to reduce budget deficits. Tax loopholes are expenditures of tax revenue that would otherwise be available to fund public services.
Here is the press release today from Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont. Continue reading
Taxpayers Fiscal Reform Act – 2013
Changes are needed in the ability of the Washington State Legislature to fund basic services like education and healthcare. The current state budget problems are made more difficult by the lack of flexibility of the Legislature to make decisions by a majority vote as directed by the Washington State Constitution and by a tax expenditure/exemption process that is shielded from legislative oversight by virtue of not being part of the normal budget process.
Many people are frustrated by the current stalemate in the legislative process and want more choices than just throwing up their hands and suffering more cuts in state services and more costs to working families. More options are needed for the voters than just saying we have no real choices.
One option is now moving forward. It would reform our broken tax exemption process. Initiative 1276 – the Washington State Taxpayers Fiscal Reform Act has been filed with the Secretary of State and assigned a ballot title.
Here is the official ballot title and summary: Continue reading